路易莎．梅．艾考特原著的《小妇人》曾三度搬上银幕，各有特色。本片是1933年的第一个版本，由乔治．库克导演，凯瑟琳．赫本扮演具有男儿气概的二姊乔。故事描述十九世纪新英格兰地区的一个家庭，因父亲到前线参加南北战争，能干的母亲带着四个女儿生活，她们各自经历了成长和恋爱，在乱世中力争上游。影片拍出了平实感人的力量，每个角色都各具魅力，是值得欣赏的经典文艺片bbb

　　故事发生在十二世纪的英格兰，年纪老迈的亨利二世国皇打算举行一次聚会去选出他的皇位继承人。他召唤了诡计多多的太太，希望聚为妻子的情人，他的三位儿子及年轻但狡猾的法国皇帝菲猎；他们无一不希望可以统领皇族。为了能争夺亨利的帝国，众人都不惜用尽一齐办法去令因国皇相信自己的演说…eee

羅斯福高中就像一般美國郊區的高中一樣普普通通.幾何學女教師黛關娜,和學校女秘書卡莉,兩人雙雙墜入情網,而且投入這點就讓整個校園從平淡無奇的氣氛轉換成迷惑的情況.故事一開始是卡莉懷疑黛娜和她丈夫有染,所以一直注意黛娜的一舉ㄧ動,結果並不是她所想像.在證實她推論錯誤後,兩人開始成為無話不談的知心好友,關係越來越親密,某天瞞不住對彼此的愛慕,就在附近的籃球館裡,互訴情衷。

Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.' By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses. Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together. One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature: he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around. While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next: the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with his/her partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken. Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...